"If it becomes necessary" time?BY BENJAMIN ONG | MONDAY, 4 JUN 2012 2:24PMThe more equities drop, the more we get closer to "if it becomes necessary" time for our friend Ben to provide some stimulation. Stop looking. There are no ifs, no ands, no ors ... Upgrade your subscription to access this article
Join the growing community of private wealth specialists and family offices
with unlimited access to our latest news, research and analysis of the industry.
Become a premium subscriber today. |
Latest News
Mining, property fuel Aussie billionaires' wealth
Australian billionaires' riches are highly concentrated in mining, financial services, technology and property, accounting for 0.7% of the total US$15.1 trillion in global wealth studied by the 2026 Billionaire Census.
HNWIs demand outperforming, mission-driven endowment funds
High-net-worth investors' (HNWIs) increasing demand for philanthropy vehicles with robust governance, a clear mission and can outperform in equal measure is helping fuel the rise of endowment funds such as the Aspect Impact Fund.
Family businesses turn to external chief executives: Deloitte
While family members will largely remain at the helm of family businesses post-succession, a Deloitte Private report anticipates a meaningful shift globally, with more businesses preferring outside professionals to step into the chief executive roles.
MST Financial broadens services to Alder & Partners
MST Financial has broadened its services for Alder & Partners Private Wealth Management, providing "institutional-grade investments" across managed accounts, asset allocation and research.
Further Reading
Cover Story

Generation next
JAMES GOWING
FINANCE DIRECTOR
GOWING BROS LTD
FINANCE DIRECTOR
GOWING BROS LTD
To sustain a successful multi-generational business and legacy requires investment acumen grounded in strong family values. As part of the rising generation at Gowing Bros, executive director of finance James Gowing is helping position the 158-year-old company for the future. Karren Vergara writes.









A good reminder as why it's more useful as an investor to concentrate on what is, rather than what ought to be. I have always maintained that a 'focus on the long term' is unlikely to be a sufficient strategy for profit without some very careful asset selection in this market. Why? because many asset prices continue to reflect the expectation for intervention that Ben refers to, preventing the otherwise compelling valuation levels that ordinarily present themselves during times of market stress. It's the effective removal of this valuation risk (and the subsequent ramping up of multiples latter in the cycle) that is a key dynamic for the "profits over the long term" mantra. Without that there is little to drive those so called 'long term returns'. review you history people.